Tag Archive for 'search'

Sarah Palin is Repulsive

Although I rarely blog, I love seeing what search terms point in the direction of my site.

With the recent release of Sarah Palin’s autobiography, Going Rogue, I have noticed a spike in Sarah Palin search terms:

Sarah Palin Search Results

My favorite term searched for is “sarah palin is repulsive.” This query, by some like-minded individual, made me smile. In the spirit of revealing her true “inner beauty,” I have made an approximation of the appearance of her spirit…

As an aside, when searching for Sarah’s new book, a parody entitled Going Rouge (a coloring and activity book) has a higher ranking Amazon link than the actual book by Palin.

Cleaning my Bookmarks Through Del.icio.us Posting…

Man… I created a Flickr Creative Commons search to my Firefox search bar using Add to Search Bar, and it makes it much easier (how much? enough that much is italicized!) to find some interesting, random free pictures to accompany a post, such as one to go with this post (I may roll my own and submit it to Mycroft, as the ones submitted don’t work properly).

For example, I decided that I am writing about how I am using the Del.icio.us link posting feature to encourage me to clean my huge, unsorted, “To-Read” pile of links, I just add “cleaning” and “piles” to the search bar and wonderful amateur shots of piles and cleaning spill forth onto my screen…

Moving the Pile, originally uploaded by Matt McVickar.

Back to my point…

I have been remiss in sorting the vast quantities of links I farm through exploring the web and the RSS feeds I peruse for far too long. Therefore, I have probably 500-or-so bookmarks that are neglected to read and process. In order to filter these, I am going through them bit-by-bit, either deleting them after reading them, bookmarking permanently or posting to Del.icio.us. It is a daunting task, similar to sorting through the depicted pile above… Look how small and insignificant they are in comparison as well as unclear on the course of action to clear this morass from their purview.

Since I don’t want to shovel just any crap onto my webpage through a Del.icio.us auto-post, this means I have to think about these amassed links a bit more and digest them prior to deciding the next action. It is the first process I have employed to filter this overwhelming mass that has any prospect of working, truth be told.

So, there will be a few links for a bit… I am guessing for every 15 links I have bookmarked, about 1 will pass muster with social sharing…

(0)

Category: “Uncategorized?”

I find it intriguing that the default categorization for WordPress posts is “uncategorized.” It seems as if they should be just not categorized, so that they would not even be seen if you searched by category. “Uncategorized” is a categorization in and of itself; it seems like the ultimate paradox. That is, if it was not just a decision made by a coder without regards to semantics.

picture of an empty box - not a category

Another thing. If you search for images on Google using the keyword “uncategorized” you get many results, that seem to defy categorization. For example (all of these will be hotlinked from the sources – they can be damned – hopefully someone will exchange the picture with something cool like “don’t hotlink pictures” or a picture of genitalia, but I will not be so lucky):

This picture certainly fits into no category, except for perhaps “sucky murals.” I could go to the blog site and find out that it is some famous piece of art, but I do not care (perhaps if it were categorized I would…).

Here is an uncategorized picture of a person in from of an elephant mural… it seems not to fit into a category, but is it uncategorized? I would say it is actually in the category of “random bad murals with people walking in front of them.” You may not think this a good category or tag, but I bet the blogger would use it more than once.

This uncategorized picture is “closer than we think,” but I do not know what we are thinking about, nor do I care. I still think that whatever “it” is in the sentence should probably be the category.

Here is an other image that came-up as uncategorized. At first I thought it was a middle-aged man staring at a half-naked woman, but, upon my hotlinking it, I realize it is the dreadfully unfunny Amy Sedaris.

Middle-aged man staring at an ass = funny and sad, Amy Sedaris doing the same thing = uncategorized (obviously).

I will go with this one as being uncategorized; when is a picture like this ever appropriate?


These pictures clearly show that being uncategorized is an apt fate for elephant-related pictures…

and whatever godforsaken animal this creature may be.

I could scour the web for posts and pages categorized as uncategorized, but, obviously, there are likely millions of unconnected, lazy posts that are growing exponentially as spam bloggers and the disenfranchised start blogs that go nowhere faster than towards coherent or relevant tags.

Obviously there is only one category for this posting, and it may be the first time that it is, in fact, relevant.