Tag Archive for 'internets'

Facebook Surveys – Is the Loss of Privacy Worth This Bullshit?

Although I don’t particularly like Facebook, the way it works, the platform in general or the social component of it, I am forced to use it in order to communicate with a few (actually many) people on the internet.

If I am remiss in my updating and reading on Facebook, in a few days time, a person I barely know will come up to me and say, “did you see my link?” If my answer happened to be “No,” I would face immediate social ostracization, loss of network status and a potential removal from said person’s “buddy list.” Actually, Facebook reminds me somewhat of a dreadfully boring RPG in which you are constantly trying to gain experience to obtain a new level that does not exist.


cc licensed flickr photo shared by MrTopf

Facebook dislike aside, this is the platform that two-thirds of the world has decided to utilize for the time being, so I will shut the fuck up.

The “killer app” for the Facebook platform that lead to their market dominance was, ironically enough, the ability to allow third-party developers to create applications for their closed platform. Although this sounds like a bum deal for the developer, they obtain something fantastic from the users that decide to use these applications: Information (for the record, the capital “I” denotes the type from which people can make money).

A Facebook app, when allowed, will allow the developer of the app access to your information, your contacts (so it can spam them), your pictures (I hope they aren’t embarrassing) and other content (that is just a little vague…):

Facebook App Dialog

In a certain sort of way, these applications are like reverse spam; they are titillatingly entitled marketing pilferers that people seek out in order to hand over their personal information. Facebook users are a damned fine source of accurate and up-to-date personal (read marketing) information.

This is an inexcusable digression from my point… People have been giving out their information for free to the wrong people since the creation of the idea of privacy (it was probably short pants, by the way).

My problem with Facebook apps (other than they steal your information) is that almost all of them are comprised of  inane survey questions that lead to an inaccurate/stupid result that has nothing to do with yourself or the essence of your being.

Hey, I love a good survey. Especially surveys with multiple questions that internally test and verify the results for consistency prior to issuing a determination of a category. Unfortunately, Facebook surveys are comprised of the following three components:

The first component is a question. It is usually about your analogical relationship with some characters/symbols/etc. in the mainstream media . I am expecting the questions to eventually become direct advertising questions: (e.g. An ad during which of your favorite TV programs would most likely motivate you to purchase our lipstick?), but they have the slightest semblance of propriety at this time.

The second component is the quiz. This quiz is usually comprised of two to three leading questions that are obviously leaning toward one of the potential answers. It doesn’t really matter whether or not there are any well thought-out questions as any result will be broad and/or inaccurate.  I created a quiz scenario that is not too far from the truth:

Quiz: Are you more like MacGyver or Rambo?

Question #1: Do you like guns? Answer choices: Yes or No

Question #2: If you were to get in a confrontation with someone, are you more likely to work it out using: Answer Choices: Guns or your Brain

Obviously, if you chose that you like guns and would be more likely to get out of a confrontation using a gun, you would be given the result that you were like Rambo. If you chose that you don’t like guns and would use your brain, then you would be told you are more like MacGyver.

If you chose either that you like guns and would use your head or that you dislike guns but would use one in a confrontation, the world may come to an end. Actually, it is more likely that the application would suffer some horrible error as it enters a recursive binary loop from which it could not escape–the world is unlikely to end due to Facebook, even though many in the media may disagree.

The third component of a Facebook survey is the results. Following the completion of the quiz, a Facebook app knows better than to immediately give you your results. That would be far too easy; you are a captive audience at this point with a deep desire to see if you are like one TV program or another. The app uses this mind-muddying anticipation/excitement to ask with whom you would like to share the application. This “sharing,” of course, means that it wants you to send an invitation to others in order to socially motivate them to use their marketing tool.

I took a screenshot of this, and I crossed-out the names and faces while showing how large and clear the “send to friends” option was in comparison to “continue to result:”

After the ten questions in this particular quiz (actually, the questions weren’t so bad, so I feel sorry to have used this app to make my example; nevertheless, I will venture onward), I found out I was like Heroes. If I was not like Heroes or Gossip Girl, I am sure that the only other choices would have been one of the three flavors of CSI, as there are no other shows on TV except these five.

Here is what it would have said if I had received CSI… “You belong in the original CSI: Just like Sin City, you like life hot and covered with bodily fluids to examine. You enjoy rehashing the same plot over-and-over with tiny changes that separate otherwise indistinguishable episodes from one another. In fact, they need another CSI show (#4) in order to have forensic scientists working day and night to determine the differences between episodes on the other CSI series. This fourth member of the CSI franchise is the series that you belong in. It would be set in Cincinnati with an aging cast of WKRP portraying scientists. You might be the guy that is good with computers or the cranky person in charge of data archiving, we haven’t decided yet.”

I would add that app…

After you get your awesome results, you are then given another opportunity to share it with other people in your “FaceStream” (this is a made-up name, but a better app would call your AJAX-y homepage with other people’s info something cool like the “LifeStream” or “River”). I chose not to do this, or spam other people with a quiz I made about myself in which I would be a willing accessory in obtaining their personal details:

At this point, you have received your awesome results and given away your valuable personal data; therefore, the survey is complete. As I don’t want the app to access my information in the future, I removed it while giving it helpful feedback and the score it deserved:

App removal

(1)

MySpace Referring Links are Untraceable…

It seems to me that I am paying to host my own space that no one reads…

Seriously though, I saw that someone linked to my page through Myspace, and I just wonder about the allure of the site in general. Also, I wonder who linked me, so that I can ridicule them about their n00bish web ways. Unfortunately, Myspace uses sophisticated hashing and redirects so that you can never discover who thinks you are awesome. They just may suck a bit.

MySpace consist mainly of pics that look like this…

Whoever would claim a space as their own with scrawled upon walls and shitty-ass scene pics is not worth recognizing on the web.

Taming RSS Feed Overload While Trying New Voices…

I love to subscribe to new RSS feeds, but it is difficult to distinguish the high quality, essential feeds from the unknown, spurious or bad without a system. In order to allow myself fresh voices while retaining the above-average, I employ the following methodology.

In order to try new RSS feeds and still be able to easily distinguish those that have made the cut from the rookies, I use folders that are designated testing grounds… I call them Purgatories:

Hell... not a purgatory

I have created 9 purgatory folders below my time-tested hierarchal arrangement of feeds. These are loosely affiliated groups that are based upon my reading interests (e.g. video games, web/design, cartoons/comics, random, etc.), so I can group them quickly as I subscribe to a feed. In practice, these look like this:

Purgatories...

In order to not overwhelm myself with unread feeds, I delete these purgatory feeds after approximately 20 posts if they have not piqued my interest. I have found that twenty is the optimal point for myself to determine interest, but I am sure it varies from one to another.

I like to look at frequency, depth of article, voice and “interestingness” (to use the Flickr term); an undefinable quality determining how something interests you.

I question all feeds I am subscribed to, from time-to-time, in order to prune those feeds that have gone down in quality or in which my interest has waned. I find that grouping them by a more structured semantic grouping allows myself to read through several related feeds while I am in the mood.

I find that this process allows me to try reading new voices, yet lessens my likelihood of becoming overwhelmed. Of course the best advice for taming RSS overload is just to hit “read all” occasionally; you will never miss (or know) what you have missed…

(0)

Firewalls Are Lame…

Any picture for a post about firewalls would be abstract and/or boring, so I am going with this man wielding A WALL OF FIRE!

Firewall, originally uploaded by Lili Vieira de Carvalho.

I have been using Comodo Personal Firewall for approximately a year, and I recently downloaded NEW! Version 3.0! After a few days, I have realized that v3.0 is a pain in my and many other people’s collective asses. It looks nice, and seems to be damned robust, but I cannot get my onboard WiFi access point to connect to the internet to share. Other devices can connect to it, just not connect tot the goddamned internet. After wasting several hours reading forums and trying anything that came to mind, I gave up and went back to v 2.4.

This should have been the end, but no. Then, like the fool that I am, I had to fix 2.4 to share the internet via WiFi. Not too tough, but 7 hours later, I decided to try 3.0 again using the same theory employed to fix 2.4. Unsurprisingly, this failed miserably. I then spent another hour uninstalling, reinstalling and reconfiguring bullshit programs.

What a fucking wasted day. I was hoping to stay home and be productive without the diversions of the office environment, but this productivity was halved by software difficulties.

 

Damned Bank Spam Scams…

A few days ago, my wife received the following message in her e-mail box and she e-mailed it to me asking if it is a legitimate message from a bank:

From: “Bank of America” <no-replymail@google.com>
Subject: *** Important Notice from Bank of America Billing Center ***

We recently have determined that different computers have logged onto your Online Banking account, and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We now need you to re-confirm your account information to us.

If this is not completed by September 19, 2007, we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. We thank you for your cooperation in this manner.

To confirm your Online Banking records click on the following link:
http://0xd3.0×90.0xcc.0×87/icons/small/www.bankofamerica.com/sslencrypt218bit/online_banking/

Thank you for your patience in this matter.

Bank of America Customer Service

Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.

© 2007 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved.

When you click on the link, it goes to a webpage that looks like this:

BOA Scam Detail

This is a type of scam message and link that is intended to look and feel almost identical to actual banking correspondence… Scammers send out e-mails for the most common banks to scads of e-mail addresses, They don’t know your bank! They just want you to think that this is for you in particular. I get scam e-mails from major banks that I don’t even bank with all the time. when I receive one from my bank, it even makes me look twice.

There are a few quick, easy and painless manners to determine the legitimacy of a message like this type:

The easiest way to find out is to look at the URL that it wants you to follow:

Scam URL Detail

In this case, it is a random string of characters with a link to an image named “Bankofamerica.com”. Any bank is going to have a link to their proper, official website, not an alphanumeric URL. If the bank website isn’t the linked site, it is a scam.

Some scam e-mails will have text for the proper e-mail address hyperlinked to the scam site URL. In this case, you can hover on the link copy or right click on the link location and paste it into a text editor or other such place to see if they match.

The second method to quickly determine if this message is a scam is to look at the originating e-mail address. In this case, it was sent from a dummy GMAIL box – “no-replymail@gmail.com“. Any legit business is going to have their company e-mail address match their website. If they don’t, it is a scam.

Unfortunately, this is not the best manner in which to check, because spammers can change the manner in which the e-mail name is displayed that is not easily determined by the average e-mail user (the people to whom these messages are sent). This individual did not make the e-mail from field say “customerservice@bankofamerica.com“, but they easily could have.

Bottom-Line: ANY e-mail from a financial institution or bank asking for you to login to an e-mailed link is a scam.

That is why they (banks) have moved towards adding a random picture that you have chosen as a double-check. This allows a bank site to be random and specifically personalized for your expectation.

If a bank thinks that your account has been compromised by fraudulent activity, they will call you or send something in the mail. Even then, you should ask them to give your personal information (e.g. SSN, maiden name of mother, etc.) to verify them. Unfortunately, everything is a scam, and the scammers are getting far more sophisticated (everybody is tricked for the first time — you think it is a scam, but it has the look and feel of reality).

If you are still in doubt, login to the banking website using the proper address entered manually into your browser’s URL bar or utilizing your normal banking bookmark.

Current browsers and e-mail clients have added features to stop Phishing. Thunderbird, Outlook and any other modern e-mail client blocks pictures linked from outside sources (this is a manner in which spammers can see if a live person is reading a spam) as well as identifying potential scam e-mails:

TB Scam message

Modern internet browsers such as Firefox, Opera and IE7 (and I believe even the old standby IE6) have so-called “phishing filters” that identify possible spoof links or forgeries when you travel to these sites. These work in two ways: they are identified by other browsers that have seen them and others that have questionable certification, etc.

Phishing Alert

Here are some other awesome resources from Microsoft, Wikipedia, Anti-Phishing, and the very old-fashioned looking web-page of the National Credit Union.

(3)